Revenue Cycle Experts: $50-$115/hr Reviewing AI

Open application· 63 spots this round

$50-$115/hr revenue cycle and billing work, on your schedule

Review AI-drafted claims, denials, and appeals like a worklist before close, flagging the claim that bounces, the appeal that won't stick, the write-off worth fighting. Remote, paid hourly, on your schedule.

Fully remoteYour scheduleWeekly pay

Apply nowApply once, get matched on a rolling basis. No prior AI experience needed.

Trusted by top research companies

Rated by experts worldwide

4.4/ 5

Based on 18 verified reviews

4.9/ 5

Based on 36 verified reviews

Hi, we're Zac and Jack, the founders of Terac. We want to talk to you directly, because you are the most important part of what we're building.

Terac is a community of experts. People who have spent years getting good at something specific and hard. The world is about to need more of you, not less. As AI takes on more of the world's work, the bottleneck shifts to the people who actually know what they're talking about.

Expert labor is the rarest resource in the world right now, and it is shockingly hard to find. The companies that need a revenue cycle analyst's eye on a denial that should be appealed spend weeks chasing people, paying placement fees, and settling for whoever is available. Meanwhile thousands of qualified people are sitting with knowledge that no one ever asks for.

That gap is what we're here to close. Every project that lands on Terac is routed to the people who actually know the answer, on their schedule, paid fairly, and only when the work is verified. No middleman taking a cut of your time. No vague gigs. No chasing checks.

We care about every single person in this community. If you join Terac, you're not a row in a database to us. We read the feedback. We answer the emails. We will fight for you when a customer is being unreasonable, and we will be honest with you when something on our side is broken. The quality of this panel is our entire company, and we owe you a serious bar.

If you've made it this far, here is what we're asking: claim your profile. Put your expertise on the record. Let the world's most ambitious teams come find you for the work only you can do.

Zac & Jack

Founders

Revenue Cycle questions

Still curious? Write to us at support@terac.com.

Denial specialists are among the most in-demand profiles we work with. Models struggle precisely with the calls experienced denials staff make daily: interpreting LCD/NCD conflicts, building necessity arguments, deciding when an appeal is worth the cost. Your focus is an asset. Deep expertise in denials, charge capture, or payer contracting produces the most useful training signal.

Your credential shapes which tasks you are matched to. AHIMA credentials like CCS or RHIA weight toward coding accuracy and ICD-10-CM/PCS sequencing; AAPC credentials like CPC or COC weight toward professional-fee and outpatient evaluations. Uncredentialed billing managers with verifiable AR, claims, or payer experience also qualify, matched to workflow and process tasks.

It is grounded in real artifacts: judge whether a model's ICD-10 or CPT sequence is accurate, assess whether an AI-drafted appeal applies the right necessity criteria, or rate a model's denial root-cause analysis. You may also write annotated examples of how an experienced biller handles a complex remittance or underpayment dispute, step by step.

Tasks use de-identified or synthetic data, so you never handle real PHI. But your HIPAA fluency matters: some tasks ask whether a model's proposed workflow would create a compliance gap in the real world, and spotting that is what makes expert review valuable. You are never asked to advise on a live account or counsel a covered entity.

Payer-side experience is explicitly in scope and often underrepresented in our pool. Payment integrity, claim audit, clinical editing, and coordination-of-benefits expertise help evaluate AI outputs from the angle of what actually triggers a denial or recoupment. If you have used ClaimsXten or Cotiviti correct-coding systems, that applies directly to AI coding and editing tasks.

Why your expertise matters

Revenue cycle sits where clinical documentation, payer policy, and federal regulation meet. A model that miscodes a procedure, misapplies a payer LCD, or conflates ICD-10-CM specificity rules can trigger denials, audits, or improper payments at scale. Judging whether a billing recommendation actually holds up under RAC scrutiny or payer contract terms is what labs need before these systems reach production.

How pay works

The top of the band goes to a high-complexity niche: Medicare Advantage HCC mapping, OPPS edits, or payer-specific denial management. Encoder fluency (3M360 Encompass, Optum EncoderPro) and credentials like CPC, CCS, CPMA, or CRC raise placement too. All work is remote, billed hourly, paid only after verification. No weekly minimum.

What the work looks like

A sample of the revenue cycle and billing work you would pick up. Every project is scoped, remote, and paid on verified completion.

Review a model's ICD-10-CM recommendation for a complex inpatient encounter and flag specificity errors, sequencing mistakes, or missing secondary diagnoses a payer would reject.
Evaluate a model's explanation of a Medicare LCD criterion and find where it overgeneralized the indication, omitted diagnostic thresholds, or cited the wrong MAC jurisdiction.
Annotate AI-drafted denial appeals, marking whether each clinical rationale cites the right payer policy and matches documentation to the claim line.
Write a worked example of assigning HCC codes from a progress note, narrating suspect diagnosis capture, chronic condition conventions, and hierarchical exclusion rules.
Stress-test a coding assistant with a multi-procedure operative note and document where it bundled separately reportable services or missed a modifier.
Score a model's patient financial responsibility estimates against the EOB, contractual adjustment logic, and balance billing protections under the No Surprises Act.